AgentAI for Urology

Urology billing that survives the audit.

AgentAI combines urology reimbursement specialists with agents that trace every billable, CPT line, rejection, denial, and aged no-response — by provider, payer, and location.

1989
30+ yrs urology RCM
CPMA
certified coding auditors
Per-MD
reporting
US-led
expert team

We’ve seen your denials before

Urology doesn’t leak like other specialties. It leaks in E/M levels, bundling edits, and global periods.

Measured across the urology practices we bill — 90 days of real payer responses, spring 2026. These are the denials our agents are built to prevent:

$40–60 lost on every under-leveled visit

E/M under-leveling

Complex urology visits billed below the level the documentation supports — the safe-looking choice that bleeds on every encounter and still doesn’t protect you in an audit.

E/M level matched to the note, with the evidence anchored to it.

CO-97 — bundled to $0

Cystoscopy bundling errors

52000-family procedures billed without the correct NCCI pairings — the payer bundles the second procedure into the first and pays nothing for it.

NCCI pairings checked line-by-line before submission.

denied as “included in surgery”

Global-period modifier misses

Visits and procedures inside a global period billed without the exception modifier — work you did, denied as already paid for.

Global-period rules checked on every claim; exception modifiers surfaced for review.

wrong frame — denied or patient-billed

PSA screening vs diagnostic

Screening PSA billed as diagnostic (or the reverse) trips coverage rules and turns a covered test into a denial or a surprise patient bill.

Screening vs diagnostic rules checked against the diagnosis.

component codes bundled to $0

Urodynamics bundles

Multi-component urodynamics studies billed without the right combinations — components vanish into each other and the reimbursement goes with them.

Bundle combinations validated before the claim leaves.

same-day E/M denied — or audit exposure

Modifier 25 discipline

Same-day E/M with a procedure needs a defensible modifier 25 — miss it and the visit is denied; overuse it and you’re an audit target.

Modifier 25 surfaced only where the documentation supports it — approved by the auditors.

What we handle

Where we’ve acquired elite billing companies, their veteran billers oversee the agents — and the agents learn your specialty from millions of real paid claims. E/M leveling that survives audit, cystoscopy families, urodynamics bundles.

See what you’d keep
E/M leveling that survives audit
Cystoscopy 52000 families
Urodynamics bundles
PSA screening vs diagnostic rules
Global-period exceptions
Modifier 25 discipline

The rule library

Audit-grade coding, applied by agents — supervised by the auditors themselves.

What the acquired urology team brought onto the platform:

E/M leveling with evidence anchored to the clinical noteAudit-defensible documentation trails on every coded claimCystoscopy 52000-family NCCI pairings checked line-by-lineGlobal-period modifiers (24, 58, 59/XU, 78, 79) applied when supportedModifier 25 flagged for auditor review — never added automaticallyPSA screening vs diagnostic coverage rules by payerUrodynamics global vs component billing validatedJ-code drug units matched to buy-and-bill invoicesProstate-biopsy MUE limits trackedPer-physician performance reporting

Every rule came from a real audit or a real denial. The auditors’ conventions now run on every claim, every day — and every new payer behavior becomes a rule for every practice on the platform.

Measured on urology claims

The platform numbers, with cohorts attached.

98.6%
Claims accepted on first submission
629 of 638 · payer acknowledgments · multi-location podiatry group · three-week cohort · Jun–Jul 2026
23 min
Median rejection → corrected resubmission
Resubmitted payer rejections · June 2026
< 1 day
Median denial → first action
Denied claims · June 2026 · same podiatry group: 6 days before go-live
Your book
Your urology cohort comes with your Leak Scan
Measured on your own last 90 days of payer responses, by provider and payer

Who runs it

The urology billing company we acquired in 2026 came with certified coding auditors whose judgment trains and supervises our agents.

Urology groups don’t hire a biller — they hire judgment. The auditors who joined us have spent careers earning that trust; now agents do the busywork, and their judgment is applied where it actually pays: coding integrity and the difficult dollars.

Urology expertise, immediately

Urology judgment behind the agents.

Not a call center. The auditors who joined AgentAI have defended urology coding for decades — the agents just took the busywork off their desks.

Mark N. Painter, CPMA, MBS
Mark N. Painter, CPMA, MBS
Founding authority · co-founded 1989

Nationally published urology coding and reimbursement educator. AUA coding seminar faculty. Co-host of the Urology Coding and Reimbursement Podcast. Mark leads the urology billing practice that trains and reviews our agents’ coding judgment.

Marianne DeSciose
Marianne DeSciose
Urology RCM operations

Practice management, EHR, claims, onboarding, and workflow expertise across large multi-provider groups and independent practices — the operational counterpart who makes switching painless.

Questions urology practices ask

Do we need to replace our EHR, PM, or clearinghouse?

No. We connect to what you already use and work as an extension of it — the scan itself is read-only under a signed BAA.

Can you start with one provider, site, or payer?

Yes — that’s exactly how the 5-step path works: scoped cohort, review, pilot in parallel, then controlled expansion.

Our E/M levels get challenged. How do you code them?

From the documentation, with the evidence anchored to the note — the same way our auditors have defended levels for years. If the note supports a higher level, we bill it and can show why; if it doesn’t, we tell you what’s missing.

Who reviews coding-sensitive recommendations?

The certified urology coding auditors on our team. Agents flag and draft; people approve — especially anything a payer auditor would read.

What happens in an audit?

Every coded claim carries its documentation trail. The answer to “why this level, why this modifier” is attached before the payer ever asks.

See what your urology billing is leaking.

Free 90-day Urology Revenue Leak Scan — read-only, in plain English. Your own E/M levels, bundling edits, and aged no-response, with dollars attached.

Run a Free Revenue Leak Scan

Sources: coding practices reflect the urology billing company we acquired (2026) and rules its team has applied for decades. $40–60/visit = the gap between adjacent E/M levels. Leadership titles shown as publicly listed. Stats: measured on live platform books (podiatry cohorts, labeled per stat); your urology cohort comes with the Leak Scan. Not a guarantee of your results.

AgentAI

The first agentic billing company. Agents carry every claim; experts fight for the hard dollars.

The honest math

Leak figures model a practice collecting $1M/yr, using conservative industry benchmarks totaling 4.5% of billings, with AgentAI credited for recovering only 50% of each leak. Fees applied to collected amounts; comparison biller at 5.5%. Speed figures (same-day claims, next-day denial action, automated status checks) are measured on live practices on the AgentAI platform, 2026. “Up to 95% of actions” refers to platform actions handled by agents on mature, fully-onboarded books. Your actual numbers come from a Revenue Leak Scan of your own data. Every claim has an owner and an outcome — nothing goes quiet.

Tiered fee on fee-bearing collections: standard rates apply to the first $2.5M each contract year, with 2.9% above that amount, meaning your overall rate exceeds 2.9%. Tiers reset each contract year. Rates and terms are set in your signed agreement. Subject to acceptance by AgentAI, Inc. or its affiliates; this offer may be modified or withdrawn.

© 2026 AgentAI, Inc. · Los Angeles · HIPAA-compliant safeguardsPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service